This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.


A bit of data which remembers the affiliate who forwarded a user to our site and recognises orders from those who become customers through that affiliate.


Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Enrol now on the free landlord tax strategies course

To enrol in the 7 tax saving strategies email course complete the form below. The first module will be emailed to you immediately.

Enrol now on the free landlord tax strategies course

Thank You!

Free Tax Saving Strategies Course
The seven FREE property tax busting strategies course reveals the secrets of how to legitimately beat the taxman and boost your property profits!
View All Questions

Must the value of our properties be added together for stamp duty purposes?


My mother is selling her house to her grandson for £138000 and her grandson is selling his house to my mother for the same amount.  They have been independently valued at these amounts for mortgage purposes.


We have been informed by our solicitor that because they are related the value of both properties must be added together for stamp duty purposes which puts them into the 3 percent bracket. 


Both houses are in a disadvantaged area so if valued at £138000 no stamp duty would be payable, but as they are being added together not only does it put the payment up but also means we can't claim the money back as it's a disadvantaged area.


Can you tell me if this is factually correct and if there is any way to not have to pay this duty which seems slightly crazy bearing in mind that if they were strangers they wouldn't have to pay it.  It seems that they are being penalised for being related.


Arthur Says

As your question stands, unfair as it may seem, the solicitor is correct.


However, if, instead of doing the exchange, the first side physically paid £138,000 to the second side, and acquired the second house, and then when the dust had settled on the first transaction, the second side physically paid £138,000 to the first side and acquired the first house, as an independent transaction, then maybe the Revenue would accept that there should be no Stamp Duty to pay.

Case Study

Landlord Tax Secrets Get our SEVEN FREE Landlord Tax Saving Strategies - Guaranteed To Slash Your Property Tax Bills!
Click here for more.

Got a burning tax question?

Why not submit a tax question to our tax advisors

Ask a Question