This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Marketing

A bit of data which remembers the affiliate who forwarded a user to our site and recognises orders from those who become customers through that affiliate.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Enrol now on the free landlord tax strategies course


To enrol in the 7 tax saving strategies email course complete the form below. The first module will be emailed to you immediately.

Enrol now on the free landlord tax strategies course

Thank You!

Free Tax Saving Strategies Course
The seven FREE property tax busting strategies course reveals the secrets of how to legitimately beat the taxman and boost your property profits!
View All Questions

Is the Cost for Vacent Possession of a Property an Allowable Expense or Property Cost?

Question I had a tenant in my property for some 20 years and under AST from the time the law came in. Due to non payment of rent and nuisance being caused on numerous occasions, I decided to get vacant possession of my property. In the process I had to pay him £30,000. Is this payment allowed against my rental income in future?  If not, is it an extra property cost to be claimed at the time of sale?

Arthur Says:
On page PIM2205 of the HMRC Property Income Manual it says that 'the cost of evicting an unsatisfactory tenant in order to re-let the property' is an allowable legal and professional cost, i.e. it can be offset against your rental income.

However, on page CG71262 of the HMRC Capital Gains Tax Manual it says that 'If a landlord makes a payment to a tenant to procure the surrender of a lease, that payment will qualify as allowable expenditure under TCGA92/S38 (1)(b), provided that it is reflected in the state or nature of the property at the date of its disposal by the landlord. An example of such expenditure which would not be reflected in the state or nature of the property at the date of disposal would be where, following the surrender of the old lease, the landlord granted a new lease on essentially the same terms.' This implies that it should be treated as a capital expense, to be claimed at the time of sale.

It must be either a capital or a revenue expense, it cannot be both. I think that perhaps the difference between the two statements is that when the payment is to the tenant, it is treated as a capital expense. Therefore, it must comply with the rule for allowable enhancement expenditure, i.e. it must be reflected in the state or nature of the property at the date of its disposal by the landlord. However, if the payment is to someone else, then it is a revenue expense.

Landlord Tax Secrets Get our SEVEN FREE Landlord Tax Saving Strategies - Guaranteed To Slash Your Property Tax Bills!
Click here for more.

Got a burning tax question?

Why not submit a tax question to our tax advisors

Ask a Question